Lies told to Homeland Security Analysts

Dear Office-Politics,

Hello! Here’s the dilemma facing myself and four other coworkers: we are contractors working on a government project as ‘homeland security analysts.’ The project itself is great, but it’s our contracting company that has lately been causing some issues.

For some history, we were the first ‘analysts’ hired by this company, as they primarily deal in IT. What we do is not IT at all. The company was trying to get their foot in the door in the ‘analysis’ field and we were their first ‘hires’, but we were told by them that they would be growing in that area and that we would be able to move to other ‘analyst’ projects if we ever got tired of ours….which we found out later was a lie.

Well, we had our quarterly meeting with out management team last month and all the other employees there were IT, so it was a very tech-heavy discussion. When it came time for us ‘analysts’ to ask questions, they had no answers for us as to exactly where our job description fit in on their IT Org Chart, and we were told they’d ‘get back to us.’

When I questioned exactly what we would need to move up in the company, they told us we would need to take on IT duties since they don’t have an ‘analyst’ job path set up! On top of that, we found out that after three years we are still the only ‘analysts’ in the company and that they have failed to hire more of them… so they lied when a year ago we were told we could always transfer to another ‘analyst’ position within the company! The CTO even asked “Are you guys our only analysts?” and “What exactly do you guys do?”

But the main problem we have is that we were told by our CTO that we would need to ‘move towards the IT side’ in order to move up in the company. It seems clear now that they have no clue what to do with us, and maybe never will. Most of the blame for this should lie with our Project Manager, who we only see four times a year. But he was the one who hired us and dealt with us over the past couple of years, and now with his boss (the CTO) around neither one of them seems to know what to do with us, or care!

All of us felt insulted that we were told to ‘get more IT training’ since we all have extensive military experience in the security field and we are basically being told to change careers in order to get better raises! Any advice would help!

Thanks,

Annoyed Contractor

OFFICE-POLITICS REPLY BY TIMOTHY JOHNSON

Dear Annoyed Contractor,

You and your colleagues need to look in the mirror and repeat: “I am in sales. I am in sales. I am in sales.”

Yes, I read your letter. You’re an analyst. You’re a homeland security analyst. And I would be willing to bet that you’re probably a very competent and talented homeland security analyst. HOWEVER, you’re a very talented and competent homeland security analyst who did not create a strong personal brand or a value proposition that stands out and makes the right people take notice.

Often, people who are passed over for promotion or job advancement blame office politics for their dilemma. Sometimes that really is the case; sometimes the person who is passed over has not promoted himself or herself in order to make management want to promote him or her. In looking at your situation, you waited until a quarterly meeting to ask about your job prospects (putting your management on the spot… not always a good strategy to blindside them in a public forum). What communication did you have with your contracting company between quarterly meetings? Did you have a senior analyst, management liaison, or contracting sales representative with whom you worked? Did you communicate your contributions to the client to them? When you first contracted with the company, knowing that you were the first analysts hired, did you attempt any kind of proactive negotiation for your career path? It sounds like you took their word for it.

In case you think I’m coming down hard on you, in your defense, it sounds like your contracting company did not handle your situation very well. You are not IT professionals. You are analysts. It is unfair of them to expect you to become fish out of water in order to advance. As a consultant who has commonly contracted in the past, I have observed unethical behaviors in contracting firms. What this observation has taught me is to get things in writing, especially from contracting sales people and contracting recruiters. Be specific and remove any ambiguity. This is not cynicism talking as much as just common sense and experience.

In light of everything, what is your next course of action? Before you do anything, review your contractual obligations with the contracting firm. Be very focused to review where issues such as non-compete agreements and contract exits are spelled out. From there, you have a couple of choices:

1. All five of you can work together with a representative of the firm, spelling out exactly what your expectations were and what your perceptions are of the situation. Make it clear that getting IT training is not an acceptable alternative, and that you were led to believe there would be analyst career path when you signed on. You will need to also make it clear how you can add value to his organization going forward. As much as you may want to believe it’s all about you, your contracting firm will not share that view. You will also need to make a compelling statement about what’s in it for them to help you reach your career goals.

2. Homeland security has been a growing industry since 9/11, and it will continue to grow, develop, and evolve. If you are contractually able, talk to your government client and ask about being hired as full time employees. Or seek work with another contracting firm and another project. Your skills are in demand, with or without IT skills. If you are not appreciated by your current contracting firm, you always have an option to seek employment elsewhere.

Give the first option a shot first. If you get nowhere, then try the second one. You are still in control of your futures, but you will need to learn the importance of personal branding from this situation. I wish you the best. Now go out there and wow ‘em. Thanks for writing to Office-Politics.

Best wishes,

Timothy Johnson, Author

Timothy Johnson is the author of Race Through the Forest – A Project Management Fable (Tiberius, 2006) as well as the upcoming GUST – The “Tale” Wind of Office Politics (Lexicon, 2007). In addition to writing, consulting and coaching, he teaches MBA classes at Drake University on Project Management, Creativity, and Office Politics.

Landed in a political minefield

Dear Office-Politics, I've just joined an organization, and I feel I've landed in the middle of a political minefield! One of my co-workers is a lady (lets call her Linda) ... whose been with the organization for 15 years. She's well connected in terms of informal networks ... as one might imagine. She seems to be feeling threatened by my arrival as some of her "projects" are being moved over to me. Our manager has only recently joined as well ... about 5 months back, and he's basically come between this lady and the director, who she reported to directly, previously. I suspect that, and now my arrival, only heightens her sense of insecurity. While she's trying to keep me out of her cliques, she does offer to take me around to "meet & greet" personnel and I can catch her exchanging glances when she introduces me. I could ...

The Diva is bad-mouthing me

Dear Office-Politics, Work in audiology, a very strange set of office politics - is a common problem at every office. Every office has a "diva" audiologist whose agenda is to prove that the other audiologists are inferior to incompetent and that she (usually she) is superior and everyone must do things her way. In this office, the Director (who is over her) has to acquiesce to the "diva" because the diva and the head ENT have a 'history' that goes back about 20 years. (I.e., dissing the diva is likely to piss off the ENT which is likely get the director in hot water.) Long story short. I am the new person to "pick on" who replaced the previously picked on person who had her reputation ruined by this diva. I have no problem doing things the way the diva would; ...

Promoted but no bump in salary

Dear Office-Politics, I'm a seasoned EA who joined a small firm a year ago. Because of my experience and background, I've stood out to the firm's management. Yesterday, I was told by the CEO that I will now be supporting him, and his current assistant (who is lacking) will be reassigned. To me, this is a promotion but no additional salary was brought up. Our raise reviews are next month and he said that my review will be handled by my current boss (senior partner). Should I bring up salary with the CEO or should I wait until next month? I probably make more than the other assistant but my salary is in line with salaries in my city. Thanks for your response! Thanks, Happy but no cigar OFFICE-POLITICS REPLY BY PETER GARBER Dear Happy but no cigar, Unfortunately sometimes those in positions to give raises forget just how important raises are to those being ...

Getting everyone in a room just made things worse

Dear Office-Politics, I work in a small office with 7-8 people, with about 23 guys that work outside of the office, in the plant. We have all "got along" for many years, but this year was a hard one. We have lost people due to budget cuts. We have one lady in our office, who for some reason cannot get along with a certain employee in the plant, and she really needs to for her job to be productive. She came to me many times complaining about this person, insisting that I say nothing. She would say how he was rude to her, etc. But he is nice to everyone else. This has been going on for a while, and it got to the point where she was upset on a daily basis. So I finally confronted my boss and said we have to do something. Well ...

Desperately seasick in the Navy

Dear Office-Politics, I am having an awful time at my job. I'm in the U.S. Navy, so I can't quit. And AWOL or a dishonorable discharge is out of the question. However, the problems I'm having are not specifically military ones. I would just like to know what to do in future situations. I can trust maybe 2 people in my office of 15. I was late the other day and Radio supervisor acted like my buddy when I came in. He said that the Operations supervisor wanted to write me up but that he was behind me. I find out weeks later through a reputable source that he was the one that wanted to write me up. I also found out that my previous supervisor of the TV. Department wrote an e-mail to the others in the office claiming that I was basically a worthless piece of ****. While I ...

Boss’ new ‘pet’ is an incompetent brown-noser

Dear Office-Politics, First of all, thank you for this gorgeous website, which has provided good advice to me in many situations. Therefore I hope you may be able to help me with the following problem: I work for a boss who never chooses achievers as team leaders but employees with external relations he thinks he can profit from (and admits that). The team I am a member of was set back for almost a year since someone completely incompetent was put in charge of our IT project. Half a year ago my boss hired his new "pet", a guy he had known before from some kind of networking club. This colleague seems to be literally invincible. Ever since his first day at our company he hasn't completed a single piece of work. Instead of working he surfs the internet all day and tries to sell his fancy half-baked project ideas ...

The Office-Politics Letters that appears as a feature of this Website are an educational and discussion oriented column designed to help the reader better understand ethical issues. The matters discussed in the letter are reviewed in a summary and abbreviated way and are only meant to foster thinking on the part of the reader. If a person decides to adopt or implement suggestions, they do so at their own risk. No representation or warranty is provided in relation to suggestions or the contents of the advice letter. Neither the authors of the advice letter, Franke James, John W. Burton, Rick Brandon, Marty Seldman, Timothy Johnson, Jennifer Glueck Bezoza, Gregory Ketchum, Erika Andersen, past advisers, guest advisers or the owners of this Website accept any liability whatsoever for any opinions expressed in the letter or for errors and omissions. All submissions to www.officepolitics.com will remain anonymous. No email addresses or identifying names will be published. Submission of letters to the Office-Politics Forum grants the Publisher, Nerdheaven Ltd. the right to reproduce, republish, repurpose and excerpt the submission in any and all other media, without compensation or contacting the author. Copyright The James Gang, Iconoclasts Inc., 2002-2026.