My new subordinate wants my job!

Dear Office-Politics,

Two weeks ago I started in a new position with a new company.

Beginning on my first day (yes, my first day!) one of my new subordinates began a series of troubling comments and actions including:

1) In our very first meeting he stated that the loss of the previous person in my position (his old boss) was a big one for the company and that it would set us back. He also said that the two previous individuals in my position hadn’t lasted long, so, “good luck“.

2) He took the seat at the head of the table at our first staff meeting before I arrived in the room.

3) He has so far circumvented my attempts to learn about the results and activities of his department usually by either claiming that he does not understand what I am asking for, talking around the subject in a circular fashion, or saying he’ll get back to me and then not doing so.

4) In our most recent meeting said he suggested that I set up the booth for an upcoming trade show (although as a VP for the company that is clearly not in my job description), told me erroneously that one of his subordinates was invited to the show (who was not), suggested that I’d better hurry up about getting ready for two other upcoming shows and that my lack of knowledge about them, “scared the hell out of him“, and finally said that the attendance of the principals of our company at another upcoming show was a way for them to evaluate my performance and I should question their attendance. He also listed a bunch of things he needed from me including signatures on sales expenses and expense reports and confirmation of his bonus structure and then looked annoyed when I said I’d have to get back to him.

Unfortunately, however, he was apparently hired by our company’s founder who, while out of the day to day management, still owns a good portion of the company and is still very politically powerful. When he threatened to quit last year, he circumvented his previous boss and went straight to the founder who apparently asked our President to save him by promoting him to his current position. My predecessor, his boss at the time, was fired soon after.

I am shocked that he is acting this way so early, but at least it is not subtle. This position is a good one for my career and I don’t want to let this guy hurt my chances to do well. I also know that both my boss and the company’s founder supported my being hired, after an intensive recruiter search. I have skills that the company needs and that my subordinate does not have. Since the group he heads is not very strategic for the company, I can probably just leave him to it and make my mark in other ways. Is that what I should do?

Sincerely,

Disbelieving

OFFICE-POLITICS REPLY BY DR. RICK BRANDON AND DR. MARTY SELDMAN

Dear Disbelieving,

We are very confident about your future because your letter indicates that you have already developed a high degree of Organizational Savvy. We think it would be useful for our readers for us to highlight the skills and awareness you already possess before we give you our recommendations for moving forward.

Awareness
At least half of being savvy is being alert to signals and analyzing situations correctly. You have picked up the “tells” of a subordinate from day one. This person is demonstrating a variety of sabotage behaviors and is showing you that he is not afraid of you in any way. You are correct to take these actions very seriously and won’t be victim to “I didn’t see it coming”.

Why would a subordinate engage in this type of risky behavior? Usually it is one of two reasons: either they are making risky mistakes or they know something that you don’t and these facts actually make the behavior not really a risk to them.

Analyzing power

You are very astute to do a power analysis. How much power does he have and how much do you have in this situation? This is a crucial step to make before you decide on how to deal with an overly political, sabotaging subordinate or peer. Many people do not do this accurately and suffer the consequences.

In this case your analysis reveals that he has the power to circumvent policy and possibly get his previous boss fired. That is a lot of power.

You also have some power now because you were just hired. Sometimes this affords you a “honeymoon” period where your power is the highest. We must consider this possibility because he will likely try to erode your power in a variety of ways.

Savvy options
For every decision there are payoffs, trade-offs and risks.

You are doing a very good job of weighing these factors to decide what is the best option for you. We see three possibilities. Each one could be viable but it will depend on your tolerance for risk.

1. Workaround
This seems to be the one you are leaning towards and we have recommended this option in many situations. It has some risk in that he is still there, not performing and will continue to try to undermine you. It avoids a direct confrontation but if you do this continue to monitor and document his behavior. He will continue to give you bad advice, hide information and manage the airwaves against you.

2. Transfer
We know this is passing along the problem to someone else but there may be a place in the organization where he will do less damage to the company. In any case, we would try to skillfully get him off of our team because you are unlikely to ever be able to trust him. The main chance he will change is if he sees you get more power and will win a confrontation. So continue to add value and align with senior managements agenda.

3. Hardball
This is the confrontation option. A version of “Him or Me”. This is risky and you should only do it when you can document what he has or hasn’t done and line up other people who will back you up. Even then you should be prepared to leave if they won’t take him out of your organization. Because you are already leaning towards option 1 we would stay with that.

But be alert that if he weakens your reputation, your power will recede. Also look for visible ways he may mess up. That may give you the ammunition to pursue option 3.

Thanks for writing to Office-Politics.

Good Luck,

Rick Brandon, Ph.d. and Marty Seldman, Ph.D. Co-authors,
Survival of the Savvy: High-Integrity Political Tactics for Career and Company Success

Rick Brandon, Ph.d. and Marty Seldman, Ph.D. are Co-authors, Survival of the Savvy: High-Integrity Political Tactics for Career and Company Success. Dr. Rick Brandon is CEO of Brandon Partners. He has consulted and trained tens of thousands at corporations worldwide, including Fortune 500 companies across a variety of industries. Dr. Marty Seldman is one of America’s most experienced executive coaches. His 35-year career includes expertise in executive coaching, group dynamics, cross-cultural studies, clinical psychology, and training.

Outrage at playing the game of office politics

Dear Office-Politics, I worked for a family business for over four years. I was praised for my work, given very good raises and much more responsibility over those years. Everything was great until another family member came into my department. Once that happened, my boss, a non-family member began delegating to this person all the responsibilities that I had once handled. Spent two-hour lunches with them - completely pushed me out and became indignant to me. When I approached my boss about this and other situations that had been taking place, was told 'there is something wrong with you'. Needless to say, after six months of this, I approached the VP and his initial response was ‘it’s all politics’. I was fired two weeks later. While I am no longer in this situation which I find to be an answered prayer from my higher power, my dilemma is that I have no ...

Part I: Nice to a fault

Dear Office-Politics, I work at a small liberal company where nepotism runs rampant. Of the less than 75 employees, I can probably name about 25 people who are related to someone within the company, either directly or indirectly. That has never been a problem for me, as it never directly affected me... it was more or less an annoyance, if anything, due to the utter fact that the positions given were never properly and fairly earned. Though I'm a self-described introvert, I am very nice and friendly, at times, it even pains me being the initiator. But I live by the golden rule of "treat others as you'd like to be treated." I've always gotten along with every one, but never belonged to a clique. I don't like attention drawn to myself, but I do socialize, participate and attempt to get to know my coworkers, so that it's ...

Missing my Halo…

Dear Office-Politics, I work in “super specialty” software work. I had the “halo effect” bestowed on me by my boss for the two years I have been in this job. I even wrote his “strategy” and didn’t mind when he took credit for it. Now the halo has been transferred to another. It didn’t really bother me. However, it seems that the new holder of the halo has decided to leave and my boss has become miserable. He has started to belittle me in front of my peers and staff. I manage three others and need to command respect and trust to do my job. I have tried to reason it out with the boss, but the behavior continues. He seems to understand the problem when I talk with him in private but loses it when in meetings with the rest of the group. I am keeping notes of the incidents when ...

Favorite has Boss in hip pocket. I am getting ulcers.

Dear Office-Politics, I've worked hard to build a solid reputation as a good performer. I've had rave reviews from most of my managers. Five years ago I was asked to learn a segment of the business from top to bottom, front to back. It is complex and high pressure, but I did it and used to be considered a valuable resource. Then I got a new boss. She and her boss came together from another organization in the company. Within a month, 3 trusted colleagues told me that she was talking about me in such a disparaging way that my career was in jeopardy. Sure enough my personal stock dwindled. Most of the people who work for her do not respect her and feel that she also undervalues their contributions. I think she is so blinded by her own brightness that she can't see other's contributions. Now someone new on the team gets all ...

The boss’ little pet is a big snitch…

Dear Office-Politics, What do you do about a coworker who is not only a big snitch in the bunch but who is also the boss' little pet? Peeved at Pet OFFICE-POLITICS REPLY BY DR. JOHN BURTON Dear Peeved at Pet, What you have described in a few words raises a major issue in the workplace, that of worker loyalty. Though employers usually seek to foster loyalty to the company, the deepest ties of loyalty in many firms run from employee to employee. A co-worker who is a "snitch" and a "pet" (the two often go hand in hand) is perceived as a traitor by fellow employees, because he or she has put their loyalty with the company first. To the employer, however, this is exactly what they feel is expected of every employee. There is no simple resolution to this dilemma. In some work environments the betrayed workers can impose sanctions on co-workers who are perceived ...

Manager’s favorite is getting all the listings…

Dear Office-Politics, I am a real estate agent. The Managing broker, who is also the Office Manager of the firm we are affiliated with, is hogging all the listings. Recently he has picked a favorite agent to be his partner. Is this ethical? The Managing broker has rarely worked with other agents and never had a partner before. This agent has been with the firm for 1 month and has already accumulated more listings in that month than most of the other agents. They have been given to her by the Managing broker. There are 3 other new agents that have not received any leads from the broker. I personally have been with this Company for almost 4 years and have had only a few bones thrown my way but consider myself treated better at least than these poor new agents who are being ignored while all the business is going to the ...

The Office-Politics Letters that appears as a feature of this Website are an educational and discussion oriented column designed to help the reader better understand ethical issues. The matters discussed in the letter are reviewed in a summary and abbreviated way and are only meant to foster thinking on the part of the reader. If a person decides to adopt or implement suggestions, they do so at their own risk. No representation or warranty is provided in relation to suggestions or the contents of the advice letter. Neither the authors of the advice letter, Franke James, John W. Burton, Rick Brandon, Marty Seldman, Timothy Johnson, Jennifer Glueck Bezoza, Gregory Ketchum, Erika Andersen, past advisers, guest advisers or the owners of this Website accept any liability whatsoever for any opinions expressed in the letter or for errors and omissions. All submissions to www.officepolitics.com will remain anonymous. No email addresses or identifying names will be published. Submission of letters to the Office-Politics Forum grants the Publisher, Nerdheaven Ltd. the right to reproduce, republish, repurpose and excerpt the submission in any and all other media, without compensation or contacting the author. Copyright The James Gang, Iconoclasts Inc., 2002-2026.